Essay/short answers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

/short answers - Essay Example The war incorporates the protected and agrarian plebeian’s requests. Marcus Furius Cammillus, the preservationist Patrician pioneer saw the law as conceivable concession. The law is started towards the finish of the 375 BCE political agitation periods. In the period, there were no chosen or genuine boss judges at Rome. A few established viewpoints endeavored to address the authenticity of the central officers, and furthermore guarantee more capacity to the plebeians (Walter 38). The agrarian parts of the trade off showed higher structure than substance, and consequently were effectively avoided. The year following the trade off, saw a plebeian express enthusiasm for the representative. Dominant part of the students of history show this is the underlying time plebeians were permitted to fill in as emissaries. The Lucinio-Sextian law additionally took care of the monetary interest of the Plebeians. The Consulship opening to Plebeians is the principle purpose behind the 366 BCE concessions that created both Praetorship and Curule Aedileship, which was available to just the Patricians. The Punic Wars involved three wars that occurred somewhere in the range of 264BC and 146BC, from Rome to Carthage. The wars were the biggest during that authentic period. The fundamental explanation behind the Punic Wars included the clashing enthusiasm between the Carthaginian Empire and furthermore the Roman Republic which was extending at high rates. The principle enthusiasm of the Romans extraordinarily relied upon the development through Sicily, which was a vital social dissolve point. A colossal part of Sicily was heavily influenced by the Carthaginian specialists. The starting phases of the Punic War outlined Carthage as the prevailing expert in Western Mediterranean, controlling an enormous sea domain. Rome was ceaselessly ruling force in Italy; in any case, it didn't have the maritime force that was delineated by the Carthage (Bradley 97). During the last phases of the Punic Wars, Rome too successful control of the Carthage Empire, completely demolished Carthage

Development Of Psychological Thoughts In The Philippines

Improvement Of Psychological Thoughts In The Philippines It began during the 1980s. With regards to Philippine provincial training, Filipinos accept that logical brain science originated from the West. Murray Bartlett, an American set up undergrad brain research courses in the College of Education, University of the Philippines. American course readings and English language were utilized as the mode of guidance. The beneficial thing here is that scholarly composing was in Filipino language that was in predominance. Francis Burton Harrisons strategy of fascination was additionally presented during this time.â [1]â Crafted by del Pilar, Jacinto and Pardo de Tavera were rich wellsprings of mental hypotheses despite the fact that they were proselytizers and not therapists. Indeed, even Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo referenced the term Psicologos del verbo Tagalog in his discourse. They were not title holders in Psychology yet they despite everything have this intrinsic nature. The English language and the American arrangement of Education were the instruments utilized. During the twenties American brain research educators were supplanted by Filipinos.â [2]â The Philippine issue with uncritical importation of Americans Psychological models tested a portion of the Filipinos. The principal endeavor was finished by Sinsiforo Padilla who took over from Alonzos position as an executive at the University of the Philippines. By and by, it was his partner Manuel Carreon who took the bludgeons for proper important mental testing. 1926 he distributed in New York his Ph.D. entitled the Philippine Studies in Mental Measurement. The contentions he introduced was legitimate yet the his off-base move was he distributed it in English. No one tuned in to him in light of the fact that during that time the greater part of clinicians were ahead and they directed American tests. Some saw piece of Carreons message were altered to fit the Philippine setting. change-apples-to-bananasâ [3]â Isidoro Panlasigui distinguished the new culture of Psychology. The third era of American indoctrinated Filipino clinicians like Panlasigui. Because of this, Panlasigui appreciates America and it was unmistakably indicated when he expounded on the brain science of the Filipino as he battled for the pilgrim language to be utilized. Alfredo V. Lagmay and his associates were sent to the United States not to kill the office. Lagmay contemplated Psychology in Harvard where he was prepared in the zone of Experimental Psychology. He returned to the Philippines during the poor distress under Hukbalahap with Luis Taruc, as the head. During that time, the Department of Psychology in the University of the Philippines was a piece of the College of Education. It was then Lagmays first move to move it to the College of Liberal Arts by changing the instructive perspective to an increasingly logical premise of direction. Test Psychology is currently an indispensable piece of the undergrad educational plan in Philippine schools and it was a result of him. The U.P Department of Psychology was seen as conduct direction structure the 50s up to mid 70s. His understudies proceeded with some momentous and critical examinations in the field.â [4]â The History and Lines of Filiations in Philippine Psychological Thought Brain research Academic This part of brain research turned out to be a piece of college educational plan under Francisco Benitez during 1922. It was first instructed in the University of the Philippines as a piece of the training educational plan. This is the period wherein a few investigations in brain science, for example, Experimental Psychology, Educational Psychology and Psychology of Advice Giving were presented. It was said that the Western Psychology initially entered the UP framework yet it was spread broadly in UST (University of Sto. Tomas) and University of San Carlos in Cebu. During the time of 1954, Joseph Goertz built up the Department of Psychology and utilized English as the mechanism of instructing. Then again, amidst its development in Manila this order was additionally presented as a course in the University of St. Louis in Cordillera. It was encouraged by Fr. Evarist Louis a preacher priest.â [5]â Brain science Academic Philosophy Nonetheless, Psychology-Academic Philosophy was built up first at University of Sto. Tomas by Spaniards and improved by the Jesuits. This viewpoint was more established than the perspective referenced previously. It began and established in numerous colleges like UST (University of Sto. Tomas) and other Spanish foundations like San Ignacio and San Jose. In such organizations the clinical and reasoning courses began. The thoughts and set up accounts on that time supposedly was identified with Psychology. In a more profound investigation those can contain the lifestyle previously. It incorporates the language , how the indio see the idea of self ,its reactions and the exercises of the antiquated human progress. Ethnic Psychology The third part of Psychology known as Ethnic Psychology. It begins from the Filipinos and through the impact of different nations. It isn't just more established yet additionally much confused contrasted with the past perspectives. It has numerous strands to be caught and one of those is simply the brain research that originated from the Filipinos themselves. An indigenous brain research that is claimed or impacted by different nations. The language is a cone crediting factor particularly those exercises that can show the aggregate encounters of Filipinos. Crafted by Jose Rizal and Isabelo de los Reyes were comprised of Filipino Psychology and it was enormously associated with the Psycho-Medical Psychology of our forefathers.â [6]â Social Psychology The investigation of Social Psychology is characterized as a precise investigation of the nature and reasons for human social conduct. Basically, its anxiety is about human social conduct. It incorporates a great deal of issues with respect to the people sway on others, the procedures of social cooperation and the relationship that exist between people in the general public. It isn't simply worried about the idea of social conduct yet in addition with its causes. The investigation looks to unwind the reasons and pre states of social conduct. It additionally portrays the investigation of social conduct in a unique manner. It depends on techniques, discoveries, investigations and studies. In asking what the investigation is about its 4 principle concerns were likewise considered as a methods for knowing it obviously. Essentially it is about the effect that one individual has on another, the effect that a gathering has on its individuals then the other way around and the effect of a gat hering to another group.â [7]â With regards to the order in a working definition. Therapists concentrate in understanding the conduct of people inside the setting of society. It is principally worried about the comprehension of the how and why people carry on, think and feel as the manner in which they do. In managing conduct we mean sentiments and contemplations just as plain actions.â [8]â Thus, it is characterized as a logical investigation of how a people conduct, musings and emotions are affected by a few factors that can be genuine or envisioned in the structure or the nearness of others. The field takes a gander at conduct and mental procedures remembering the social world for which we exist, as we are encircled by other whom we are associated and by whom we are impacted from numerous points of view. It centers around influence.â [9]â The meaning of Social Psychology in the Filipino setting was clarified through the meeting that I have led. As indicated by Ms. Leslee Natividad from the Department of Social Sciences, University of the Philippines, Los Baæ'†os ,when I solicited her what is the job from Filipino Social Psychology in the more profound comprehension of Filipino conduct? She offered me a definition to response the inquiry . First we need to characterize first what Social Psychology is soà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Social Psychology is the investigation of how people influence the general public and how the general public is influencing the individual .If would relate Filipino into that on how the Filipino is influenced by the general public that we have here in the Philippines and perhaps on the planet when all is said in done. Presently the world and the Philippine society influence the Filipino person. As an individual, everything that we are encountering around us. Things that we are seeing, things that we are hearing, things that are influencing every single snapshot of our lives that is a piece of Filipino Social Psychology. The entirety of our conduct is formed by the sorts of encounters that we have.â [10]â 3 Main Areas of Social Psychology Social Influence It is the manner by which others influence our conduct. It is a procedure through which the nearness of others can legitimately or in a roundabout way impact a person. These are manners by which others influence our practices through contemplations and activities. How we are raised by specific individuals to whom we associate can influence our conduct. It differs with Conformity, Compliance and Obedience. Congruity which relates to the changing of ones own conduct to all the more intently coordinate the activities of others, Several examinations recommend that people will change their conduct to fit in with those of the gathering. They can be impact by private versus vis-à-vis contact Plus, the sex and culture. Consistence is the demonstration of changing their conduct because of someone else or bunch requesting that they change. Especially, it happened when there is nonappearance of power and force. Submission is likewise a method of changing conduct at an immediate request of a power figure. Social Cognition It is characterized as the manners in which how individuals contemplates others and how they act toward others. It shifts on account of mentalities which comprise of the manner in which an individual feels and thinks too an individual acts. Impression arrangement is additionally a piece of cognizance which is framing the principal information or judgment about an individual seen just because. Attribution is simply the way toward clarifying conduct or others. They utilize this to comprehend the social world through mental processes.â [11]â What was once called th

Advocating for Science on Capitol Hill, Part 2

Advocating for Science on Capitol Hill, Part 2 Part 1 here. *     *     * Rush Holt is in the room, but most people haven’t noticed. To be fair, he’s a name rather than a face for most of us: the PhD physicist-turned-politician, one of two physicists in Congress, now the US Representative for New Jersey’s 12th congressional district. I happen to know what he looks like because an assistant addressed him by name when I passed by in the hallway. Now, I’m in a big room scarfing down bacon and coffee with over a hundred other representatives from science and engineering organizations, waiting for Rep. Holt to give a speech. And now that the Congressman is physically in the room, the internal conflict begins. I think, I will probably never have the chance to meet Rush Holt ever again. Then I think, I have nothing to say to Rush Holt, and he probably doesn’t have anything to say to me since I’m not one of his constituents, and the last time I was in New Jersey I was repulsed by the smell of industrial fumes along the New Jersey Turnpike. Finally, I gather my wits and conclude, Who cares? So, I walk over to where Rush Holt is standing. Well, actually, I walk up to Rep Holt’s staffer (Sean) and thank him for giving such a helpful presentation at the AAAS yesterday. While Sean and I are talking, Congressman Holt walks up to me. Rush Holt: Hi, I’m Rush Holt. Um, no kidding. Me: I’m Anna Ho. I’m an undergraduate at MIT majoring in physics. Rush Holt: Physics! Me: Yes, I gather that we have something in common! Oh, dear. Someone sound the “socially awkward” alarm. Rush Holt: Who do you work with at MIT? Is Rush Holt intimately familiar with MIT’s physics department…? I give him a few names. He asks where I’m from and what my research is about. We talk about pulsars, and at some point Rush Holt says yes, I know what pulsars are. Im a physicist! At this point, a number of people are trying to get Rep. Holt’s attention, to tell him that it’s speech time. I excuse myself and go sit with the rest of the American Astronomical Society delegation, as the Congressman heads to the podium. I miss his first few sentences, because Im busy wondering how many people can say that theyve talked to a Congressman about pulsars. *     *     * The United States House of Representatives occupies three office buildings along Independence Avenue. Breakfast with Rush Holt took place in one of them. We arrived there at 7:30am and waited in a long line to walk through metal detectors. The nice view of the Capitol Building nearly made up for the fact that it was FREEZING outside (Dear Washington DC: that was a pitiful excuse for Spring.) I’ve been on Capitol Hill for two days. Two days were enough to learn that things here unfold on VERY SHORT TIMESCALES. Yesterday, for example, we learned about a proposal to raise the FY 2015 NSF (National Science Foundation) budget from $7.25 billion to $7.5 billion. We were encouraged to urge our representatives to sign onto this letter. In order to urge intelligently, we had to memorize the following: it’s a “Dear Colleague” letter addressed to Chairman Frank Wolf and ranking member Chaka Fattah of the House CJS Appropriations Subcommittee, Congressman Butterfield’s office is leading the letter, the staff contact is Dennis Sills, and the deadline for signing is 1pm March 27. We are meeting with our representatives today, and March 27 is tomorrow. My team is comprised of myself, a graduate student from Georgia Tech, and an astronomer from the Harvard-Smithsonian Institute for Astrophysics. This is our schedule for the day: 9:00 AM Representative Katherine Clark (Massachusetts) 10:00 AM Representative John Lewis (Georgia) 10:30 AM Representative Michael Capuano (Massachusetts) lunch, presumably 1:00 PM Senator Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) 1:30 PM Senator Saxby Chambliss (Georgia) 2:00 PM Senator Ed Markey (Massachusetts) 2:30 PM Senator Johnny Isakson (Georgia) I’m in charge of the meetings with Representative Capuano and Senator Markey. I secured our appointments through a combination of e-mail exchanges and embarrassing phone conversations. Now, it’s 8:30am and time to find Rep Clark’s office. I hyperventilate a little bit and skim my notes from yesterday. My name is Anna Ho, and I’m a constituent living in Cambridge. I’m a senior at MIT majoring in physics, but today I’m here representing the American Astronomical Society. In the fall, I’m going to start a PhD program in astronomy â€" but when I started college, I didn’t think that I was cut out to be a research scientist. The summer after my sophomore year, I did an internship funded by the National Science Foundation. I loved it so much that I went back the next summer and did it again. I learned that I wanted to do research because I had the opportunity to try doing research. And I had that opportunity because of this program. I became a scientist because of this program, and I would be very happy to tell you more about it.   *     *     * You can learn a lot about a politician by looking around his office. For example, Representative John Lewis was one of the leaders of the African-American Civil Rights Movement, and you could probably piece this together from the shelves full of awards and medals. A Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. sign hangs over one of the big wooden doors, with the following quote: “Public officers are the trustees and servants of the people who are at all times amenable to them.” There are Coca Cola bottles everywhere. We had a similar experience in Senator Chambliss’s office later in the afternoon; apparently this is a Georgia Thing. Another Georgia Thing is peanuts. Peanut bowls in both offices prompted my Georgia Tech teammate to exclaim “Georgia peanuts!” Similarly, stepping into Representative Capuano’s office feels â€" at least, to this Massachusetts resident â€" bizarrely like stepping into a museum of home. The first thing I notice is an MIT flag on the wall, dangling with flags from all of District 7’s many universities and colleges. The tables are covered with editions of the New England Journal of Medicine and local newspapers. On the wall is a picture of Jordan Hall, where I once went to watch Davie ’12 sing Mendelssohn’s oratorio “Elijah,” as well as a plaque about Reach Out, an organization I volunteered with as an MIT freshman. Senator Markey’s office is less home-y, so while waiting for our meeting to start I sit on the long dark red couch and stare at framed pictures: over the fireplace, Markey with Obama and Markey with Ted Kennedy, on a table to my right, Markey with Obama and Nancy Pelosi, and by the door, an aerial picture of Boston and the Charles, MIT just out of sight. *     *     * We meet with Representatives in the morning, eat lunch, then meet with Senators in the afternoon. We stand up when the staffer enters, shake hands, introduce ourselves, sit around a table. When it’s my turn to lead the meeting, I tell the staffer about NSF-funded research internships for undergraduates (REUs), and how having the opportunity to do science research over the summer is what made me decide to go into science research as a career. Nicole (from Georgia Tech) chimes in to say that she did an REU as an undergraduate as well, and that it’s also what inspired her to continue in science. Kelly (from Harvard-Smithsonian) then explains that she did an REU as an undergraduate and now runs a Solar Physics REU. I emphasize that NSF funding is crucial not just for building telescope facilities and paying researchers, but also for maintaining these important educational programs. Rep. Capuano’s staffer is very interested; he pulls out a notebook, writes down the name of the program, takes notes on what we’re saying. He tells us that Capuano’s office is totally on board with all this science funding stuff, that they’ve already signed onto the NSF Dear Colleague letter, that having anecdotes like this from us is very helpful as they try to convince others to do the same. In between meetings and on the way to lunch, we walk through underground tunnels and keep an eye out for Congressmen, who are identifiable by the pins they wear. We run into Michele Bachmann while waiting for an elevator and catch a glimpse of Ted Cruz. We split up after lunch and I head over alone to the Senate building. There’s a long line inside the Senate Café; I sit at a table holding Paradise Lost, watching white shirts and pastel-colored ties flash by. The café is full of handshakes and sandwiches are tossed into paper boxes. No one seems to have time to sit and eat. And now, the Senate meetings. Turns out that Elizabeth Warren is holding a meet-and-greet: That afternoon, there is only one moment that (initially) feels like a disaster. Were sitting with Sen. Markey’s staffer, Dan, and Im running the meeting. Dan has a PhD in physics and worked at the LHC for a while, and makes it clear from the start that his office is already on board. My brain says you have an action item! and my mouth starts moving on autopilot: My Mouth: Has Sen. Markey signed onto the Dear Colleague letter circulating in the House? Dan: …Well, that’s in the House, and we’re the Senate. My Brain: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WHY ANNA WHY Thinking quickly, Me: Well, is there an equivalent letter in the Senate? Dan: No, but I would be happy to start one. Wait, what? Dan: It’s really helpful when scientists come in and give concrete suggestions for legislation they want to see. Wait, you want us to do that? Does anybody realize this? Does anybody understand the system well enough to even know what to ask for? Dan asks us to e-mail him the House letter. Still in shock, I offer my contact information as usual. Dan says that he will actually be in Cambridge in a few weeks, and would be happy to take me up on the offer of an MIT tour. A week later, Josh Shiode e-mails the AAS delegation saying “Thanks to one of our teams, Senator Markey’s office is leading a Dear Colleague letter in the Senate that closely mirrors the one in the House in support of $7.5 billion for NSF in FY 2015. Please send the below text and attached pdf to each of your Senate contacts and urge them to sign on to support this effort.” A couple of days later, Dan e-mails me to say that the letter is circulating and 11 senators have signed on so far. “Thought you’d like to know!” A week after that, I meet Dan in MITs Lobby 7. Hansol 15 gives us a tour of Prof. Brad Pentelutes chemistry lab and two graduate students show us around the Man-Vehicle Lab.  Between labs (getting around MIT involves a lot of walking) Dan and I discuss how to get scientists more involved in advocacy, and what a scientists role in advocacy is in the first place. Eventually, Dan has to go get work done so I drop him off at the Stata Center. We shake hands, and I say that Ill be in touch. I mean it.

The Violence Of Black People And People Of Color Essay

Since its not so humble beginnings in the early 1600s, the country in which we live has had a plethora of incidents regarding the mistreatment of black people and people of color. From slavery, to lynchings, to assassinations, and so forth, the pain and suffering of African-Americans has been very much apart of the â€Å"rich† history of the United States of America. Even so, with each new generation, we as a people have continued to face abuse and exploitation. At this point in our ongoing narrative, the premise of our grief has shifted to shed a light on the prominence of brutality in American police force practices. This ever so popular conversation begins with Trayvon Martin in the year of 2012. Martin was a 17 year black boy who was attacked and shot by neighborhood watchman, George Zimmerman (29) as he was walking home from a convenience store (Trayvon Martin Shooting 1). This young man was the first police brutality victim since Rodney King to receive an abundant amount of media coverage and public support. His death reinstated a nationwide conversation about the mistreatment of African-Americans when it comes to law enforcement in this country. It caused many people to come up with a plan of action, and not long after he passed, the infamous nationwide movement referred to as â€Å"Black Lives Matter† ensued (Herstory 1). Regardless of this one tragic incident, it has come to be understood that the murder of innocent black people by the hands of police has not ceased toShow MoreRelatedThe World And Me Essay1231 Words   |  5 Pagesinflicted on people of color, and specifically black people, by America. His work goes on in depth about the challenges black people face in America, the communities and the world view they grow up in. Coates’ work is masterful at boiling down and explaining the problems that people of color face, from the outright racism of a brutal police force to subtler forms of similarly dangerous discrimination in the classroom, in politics, and in the media. He couches these acts as â€Å"†¦violence, upon the bodyRead MoreB. Dubois And Booker T. Washington795 Words   |  4 Pages Sweet and Sour Do you believe in fighting violence with violence or leaving the violence untouched? W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington were two African-American rights activists during the late 1800s and early 1900s. W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington had the same idea for the end result of equality for colored people. However, they had very different approaches to reach their desired results. Booker T. Washington believed it was the right idea to approach his issues in a passive mannerRead MoreFreedom, Without Qualification Is An Important Piece Of `` Americana ``1595 Words   |  7 Pagescomplicated nature becomes an important topic when comparing the free and enslaved black women in three antebellum narratives: Harriet Jacobs’s Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Melton A. McLaurin’s Celia, a Slave, and Harriet E. Wilson’s Our Nig. Freedom is obviously preferable to enslavement—this fact is indisputable. Millions of male and female slaves risked their live s to escape slavery; no free person of color wanted to be enslaved. However, merely saying â€Å"freedom† without qualification isRead MoreTransgender Women Of Color : An Epidemic Of Fatal Violence Against Transgender And Gender945 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"There is an undeniable epidemic of fatal violence against transgender and gender non-confirming women, specifically transgender women of color in the United States†¦Ã¢â‚¬  The topic of transgender women of color becoming countless victims in our country is a travesty. Transgender and gender non-conforming individuals in general are at high risk for violent acts to befall them. The information that follows will be specifically focusing on transgender women of color in the United States. This topic of transgenderRead MoreThe Negative Effects Of Racism : Segregation And Violence1400 Words   |  6 PagesNegative Effects of Racism: Segregation and Violence Racial discrimination affects many minority groups and this issue still occurs to this day. Racial discrimination is the act of treating others differently because of the color of their skin. Although there have been laws placed to prohibit racial discrimination, racism still occurs and continues to have many negative effects to minority groups today. The negative effects of racial discrimination are discussed in the fiction novel, To Kill a MockingbirdRead MoreAnalysis Of Ori Gersht, An Israeli Photographer Essay881 Words   |  4 Pagesfocusing on is Ori Gersht, an Israeli photographer. He is a modern photographer and the names of his work are Blow Up #1; and Black Soil: White Light Red City 01. His works often reference violence, beauty, life and death. The medium vary from different printing methods. Blow Up #1 is light jet print, mounted on aluminum and size 96 x 72 in. (as the rest of the Blow Up series). Black Soil: White Light Red City 01 is a chromogenic print and size 47 1/4†³ x 59 1/16. Blow Up #1 s subjects are flowers thatRead More Analysis of Spike Lees Do the Right Thing Essay1420 Words   |  6 Pagesexhibits the spectacle of black discrimination and racial altercations. Through serious, angry, and loud sounds, Lee stays true to the ethnicity of his characters, all of which reflect their own individualism. Lee uses insulting diction and intense scenes to show how severe racism can lead to violence. The biases reflected through Do the Right Thing model those of today which has kept society in a constant feud for so long. In Oprah Winfreys dynamic episode, The Color of Fear, Mr. Mun Wah projectsRead MoreDifferences Between The And Of A Single Group1613 Words   |  7 Pagesthat show the harmful effects of this simplification. James Baldwin also defines the problems of this simplistic way of thinking and expands on Rankine’s claims to include a possible solution to this problem. People should not see others as simply black, simply women, simply gay. It is when people being to focus on the humanity common in everyone rather than the differences that separate them that real progress can be made and this responsibility doesn’t rest on the shoulders of a single group but allRead MoreEffects Of Racism1095 Words   |  5 Pages It is allowing them to be repeated without consequence. The effects of structural racism can be detrimental to the education of children in certain neighborhoods and communities. Structural racism such as socioeconomic status, racialized police violence and health disparities give African-Americans a disadvantage in public health. The socioeconomic status of African-Americans greatly affects their overall public health. Wealth is an aspect that affects the socioeconomic status of African-AmericansRead MoreThe Philosophy of Nonviolence of Dr. Martin Luther King in his Letter from a Birmingham Jail1355 Words   |  6 Pagesfrom a Birmingham Jail gave the people an insight into the mind and his unwillingness to give up on his dream for better life and respect for ‘Negroes’. However, it was not just his mentality we have an insight on but also his philosophy, his mantra. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a devoted Christian and refused to use cruel, demeaning words and unnecessary violence to get his points across to the people. He fought against the injustices brought on upon the black people by the ‘white power’ in Birmingham

A Debate Between Oedipus and Socrates on the Role of Fate

Background A very important debate that runs in our society is the role of fate in the life of a person. Many philosophers have chosen to highlight the importance of fate while many others, especially those with a scientific bent of mind, have chosen to ignore the role of fate. Many people, especially scientists, believe that fate is non-existent and that a man writes his won destiny. They believe that a man’s industry creates his fate and that there are other forces that determine the progression of his life. They cite the lives of great men and women, who had defied fate and had made a name for themselves in the society. They believe that a person must use his skills and his resources and fight against all odds to become successful in†¦show more content†¦Fate is only an imaginary belief that society and culture has bestowed on us. If we look at the origin of humans, we cans see that there was nothing like fate. Man lived his life according to instincts and completed his life cycle as his instincts told him to do so. When culture and civilizations made their mark in the world, they unfortunately also brought in a lot of limitation that has always strived to hold us back. Fate is one such belief that seeks to restrain us and keep us tied to what the society needs out of us. Oedipus: Sir, I beg to differ. The course of my life will always show you that I have lived all my life in fear of my fate. At every turn of my life, I have tried to avoid the prophecy that always hung above my head. For example, I ran away from my foster parents during my childhood years fearing that the prophecy of killing my father and marrying my mother would become true. And look what happened. Fate eventually took me to my parents and with the help of my ill-fated luck I fought and won against my own father whom I killed. Worse, fate made me marry my mother and mad me to beget my children from her. What other than fate could conquer the mighty Oedipus who had the world under his feet? What would not have I conquered if there was nothing like fate? Why did fate make me commit the grossest sins in the world? Even after I committed those sins why did fate make those facts publicShow MoreRelatedFate and Destiny7886 Words   |  32 Pages26-FEB-07 9:49 Fate and Destiny: Some Historical Distinctions between the Concepts Richard W. Bargdill Saint Francis University Abstract There has been a great deal of attention given to the â€Å"free will versus determinism† debate. However, little attention has been paid to the most common expressions from this controversy—people’s everyday experience of fate and destiny. In fact, fate and destiny are terms that are often used as synonyms as if there were no differences between the two words. ThisRead MoreExistentialism vs Essentialism23287 Words   |  94 Pagesor goal. In this sense, humans are free to choose their own destiny.   * is a philosophical term which asserts that there is a distinction between essential and non-essential (contingent or accidental) characteristics of an object. Essentialism assumes that objects have essences and that an object’s identity is its essence. Aristotle distinguished between an object’s essence and its existence. Its essence is â€Å"what a thing is.† Its essence is â€Å"that a thing is.† An object’s essence is the collectionRead MoreA Picatrix Miscellany52019 Words   |  209 PagesChapter 6 deals with the nature of man. Starting from the premise that man is a microcosm, the author opens with an enumeration of the characteristics which make man superior to all other creatures (pp 40-41). He then gives the familiar correspondences between the parts of the human body and those of the macrocosm. Though at first there are only reminiscences of the lhwà ¢n al-Safà ¢Ã¢â‚¬â„¢, we soon find whole pages together which are identical with t hat work, and, in part, with the work edited by Goldziher as TheRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesSupplement C Conducting Meetings 651 Appendix I Glossary 673 Appendix II References 683 Name Index 705 Subject Index 709 Combined Index 713 iii This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS Preface xvii INTRODUCTION 1 3 THE CRITICAL ROLE OF MANAGEMENT SKILLS The Importance of Competent Managers 6 The Skills of Effective Managers 7 Essential Management Skills 8 What Are Management Skills? 9 Improving Management Skills 12 An Approach to Skill Development 13 Leadership and Management

Rh Bill Free Essays

string(30) " with college education is 2\." St. Jude College School of Art Science and Education Manila A Term Paper Submitted as a Requirement For the Subject: Philippine Government and Constitution Submitted By: Jim Waine C. Averilla Karissa Helene B. We will write a custom essay sample on Rh Bill or any similar topic only for you Order Now Salvador Submitted To: Diosdado B. Lopega March 27, 20 HISTORY According to the Senate Policy Brief titled Promoting Reproductive Health, the history of reproductive health in the Philippines dates back to 1967 when leaders of 12 countries including the Philippine’s Ferdinand Marcos signed the Declaration of Population The Philippines agreed that the population problem should be considered as the principal element for long-term economic development. Thus, the Population Commission was created to push for a lower family size norm and provide information and services to lower fertility rates. Starting 1967, the USAID started shouldering 80% of the total family planning commodities (contraceptives) of the country, which amounted to US$ 3 Million annually. In 1975, the United States adopted as its policy the  National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U. S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200). The policy gives â€Å"paramount importance† to population control measures and the promotion of contraception among 13 populous countries, including the Philippines to control rapid population growth which they deem to be inimical to the socio-political and economic growth of these countries and to the national interests of the United States, since the â€Å"U. S. conomy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad†, and these countries can produce destabilizing opposition forces against the United States. It recommends the US leadership to â€Å"influence national leaders† and that â€Å"improved world-wide support for population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media and other population education and motivation programs by the UN, USIA, and USAID. Different presidents had different points of emphasis. President Marcos pushed for a systematic distribution of contraceptives all over the country, a policy that was called â€Å"coercive,† by its leading administrator. The Cory Aquino administration focused on giving couples the right to have the number of children they prefer, while the Ramos presidency shifted from population control to population management. Estrada used mixed methods of reducing fertility rates, while Arroyo focused on mainstreaming natural family planning, while stating that contraceptives are openly sold in the country. In 1989, the Philippine Legislators’ Committee on Population and Development (PLCPD) was established, â€Å"dedicated to the formulation of viable public policies requiring legislation on population management and socio-economic development. † In 2000, the Philippines signed the Millennium Declaration and committed to attain the MDG goals by 2015, including promoting gender equality and health. In 2003, USAID started its phase out of a 33-year-old program by which free contraceptives were given to the country. Aid recipients such as the Philippines faced the challenge to fund its own contraception program. In 2004, the Department of Health introduced the Philippines Contraceptive Self-Reliance Strategy, arranging for the replacement of these donations with domestically provided contraceptives. In August 2010, the government announced a collaborative work with the USAID in implementing a comprehensive marketing and communications strategy in favor of family planning called â€Å"May Plano Sila. † Summary of criticism Opponents of the bill argue that: (1) â€Å"The world’s leading scientific experts† have resolved the issues related to the bill and show that the â€Å"RH Bill is based on wrong economics† as the 2003 Rand Corporation study shows that â€Å"there is little cross-country evidence that population growth impedes or promotes economic growth†. (2) The bill takes away limited government funds from treating many high priority medical and food needs and transfers them to fund objectively harmful and deadly devices. The latest studies in scientific journals and organizations show that the ordinary birth control pill, and the IUD are abortifacient to 100-celled human embryos: they kill the embryonic human, who as such are human beings equally worthy of respect, making the bill unconstitutional. (3) US National Defense Consultant, Lionel Tiger, has shown empirical evidence that contraceptives have deleterious social effects (abortion, premarital sex, female impoverishment, fatherless children, teenage pregnancies, and poverty). Harvard School of Public Health scientist Edward Green observes that ‘when people think they’re made safe by using condoms at least some of the time, they actually engage in riskier sex’, in the phenomenon called â€Å"risk compensation†. There is evidence for increased risk of cancer (breast, cervical, liver) as well as significant increase of risk for heart attack and stroke for current users of oral contraceptives. The increased usage of contraceptives, which implies that some babies are unwanted, will eventually lead to more abortion; the orrelation was shown in a scientific journal and acknowledged by pro-RH leaders, (4) People’s freedom to access contraceptives is not restricted by any opposing law, being available in family planning NGOs, stores, etc. The country is not a welfare state: taxpayer’s money should not be used for personal practices that are harmful and immoral; it can be used to inform people of the harm of BCPs. (5) The pe nal provisions constitute a violation of free choice and conscience, and establishes religious persecution. President Aquino stated he was not an author of the bill. He also stated that he gives full support to a firm population policy, educating parents to be responsible, providing contraceptives to those who ask for them, but he refuses to promote contraceptive use. He said that his position â€Å"is more aptly called responsible parenthood rather than reproductive health. Economic and demographic premises The Philippines is the 39th most densely populated country, with a density over 335 per squared kilometer, and the population growth rate is 1. % (2010 Census), 1. 957% (2010 est. by CIA World Fact Book), or 1. 85% (2005–2010 high variant estimate by the UN Population Division, World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision) coming from 3. 1 in 1960. The 2010 total fertility rate (TFR) is 3. 23 births per woman, from a TFR of 7 in 1960. In addition, the total fertility rate for the richest quintile of the population is 2. 0, which is about one third the TFR of the poorest quinti le (5. 9 children per woman). The TFR for women with college education is 2. You read "Rh Bill" in category "Papers" , about half that of women with only an elementary education (4. 5 children per woman). Congressman Lagman states that the bill â€Å"recognizes the verifiable link between a huge population and poverty. Unbridled population growth stunts socioeconomic development and aggravates poverty. † The University of the Philippines’ School of Economics presented two papers in support of the bill: Population and Poverty: the Real Score (2004), and Population, Poverty, Politics and the Reproductive Health Bill (2008). According to these economists, which include Solita Monsod, Gerardo Sicat, Cayetano Paderanga, Ernesto M. Pernia, and Stella Alabastro-Quimbo, â€Å"rapid population growth and high fertility rates, especially among the poor, do exacerbate poverty and make it harder for the government to address it,† while at the same time clarifying that it would be â€Å"extreme† to view â€Å"population growth as the principal cause of poverty that would justify the government resorting to draconian and coercive measures to deal with the problem (e. g. denial of basic services and subsidies to families with more than two children). † They illustrate the connection between rapid population growth and poverty by comparing the economic growth and population growth rates of Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines, wherein the first two grew more rapidly than the Philippines due to lower population growth rates. They stressed that â€Å"the experience from across Asia indicates t hat a population policy cum government-funded [family planning] program has been a critical complement to sound economic policy and poverty reduction†. In Population and Poverty, Aniceto Orbeta, Jr, showed that poverty incidence is higher among big families: 57. 3% of Filipino families with seven children are in poverty while only 23. 8% of families who have two children live below the poverty threshold. Percentage of population living below poverty line (2003). Darker areas mean more poverty. Proponents argue that smaller families and wider birth intervals resulting from the use of contraceptives allow families to invest more in each child’s education, health, nutrition and eventually reduce poverty and hunger at the household level. At the national level, fertility reduction cuts the cost of social services with fewer people attending school or seeking medical care and as demand eases for housing, transportation, jobs, water, food and other natural resources. The Asian Development Bank in 2004 also listed a large population as one of the major causes of poverty in the country, together with weak macroeconomic management, employment issues, an underperforming agricultural sector and an unfinished land reform agenda, governance issues including corruption. Criticism of premises Opponents refer to a 2003 study of Rand Corporation, which concluded that â€Å"there is little cross-country evidence that population growth impedes or promotes economic growth†¦ population neutralism has in fact been the predominant school in thinking among academics about population growth for the last half-century. † For example, the 1992 study of Ross Levine and David Renelt, which covered 119 countries over 30 years (vs UP study of 3 countries over a few years). The RAND study also said that a large population can promote growth given the right fundamentals. Thus, they refer to the HSBC 2012 projection for 2050 that the Philippines will be 16th largest economy due to its large growing population, and those whose populations are decreasing will suffer decline. In his Primer which critiques the bill, Economist Roberto de Vera refers to Nobel prize winner Simon Kuznets’s study which concludes that â€Å"no clear association appears to exist in the present sample of countries, or is likely to exist in other developed countries, between rates of growth of population and of product per capita. Julian Simon compared parallel countries such as North and South Korea, East and West Germany whose birthrates were practically the same but whose economic growth was entirely different due to different governance factors. De Vera says that â€Å"similar conclusions have been arrived at by the US National Research Council in 1986 and in the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) Consultative Meeting of Economists in 1992† and the studies of Hanushek a nd Wommann (2007), Doppelhoffer, Miller, Sala-I-Martin (2004), Ahlburg (1996), etc. The other Nobel Prize winner who expressed the same view is Gary Becker. De Vera also states that from 1961 to 2000, as Philippine population increased almost three times, poverty decreased from 59% to 34%. He stressed that the more probable cause of poor families is not family size but the limited schooling of the household head: 78% to 90% of the poor households had heads with no high school diploma, preventing them from getting good paying jobs. He refers to studies which show that 90% of the time the poor want the children they have: as helpers in the farm and investment for a secure old age. Instead of aiming at population decrease, De Vera stressed that the country should focus through education on cashing in on a possible â€Å"demographic dividend†, a period of rapid economic growth that can happens when the labor force is growing faster than the dependents (children and elderly), thus reducing poverty significantly. In a recent development, two authors of the Reproductive Health Bill changed their stand on the provisions of the bill regarding population and development. Reps. Emerciana de Jesus and Luzviminda Ilagan wanted to delete three provisions which state that â€Å"gender equality and women empowerment are central elements of reproductive health and population and development,† which integrate responsible parenthood and family planning programs into anti-poverty initiatives, and which name the Population Commission as a coordinating body. The two party-list representatives strongly state that poverty is not due to over-population but because of inequality and corruption. Opponents also refer to the statement of the Federation of Free Farmers that history teaches about the economic advantages of a large population, and the disadvantages of a smaller population. The Wall Street Journal in July 2012 said that Aquino’s â€Å"promotion of a ‘reproductive health’ bill is jarring† since it could lead to â€Å"a demographic trap of too few workers. The Philippines doesn’t have too many people, it has too few pro-growth policies. † Opposing the bill, Former Finance Secretary Roberto de Ocampo wrote that it is â€Å"truly disingenuous for anyone to proceed on the premise that the poor are to blame for the nation’s poverty. † He emphasized that the government should apply the principle of first things first and focus on the root causes of the poverty (e. g. poor governance, corruption) and apply many other alternatives to solve the problem (e. g. giving up pork barrel, raising tax collection efficiency). They also point to the five factors for high economic growth and reduction of poverty shown by the 2008 Commission on Growth and Development headed by Nobel prize winner Michael Spence, which does not include population control. Status Legislature On 31 January 2011, six different bills were consolidated into a single RH Bill which was then unanimously approved for plenary debate by the House Committee on Population and Family Relations. On 7 February 2011, the bill was scheduled to go before the House Appropriations Committee. 6 February 2011 the bill was endorsed by the House Appropriations Committee with amendment and referred back to the Population Committee for finalizing the language. President and Cabinet President Noynoy Aquino during the presidential campaign said that it confounds him why he is always associated with the RH Bill and reiterated that he is neither an author nor a co-author, much less did he sign the committee report regarding the bill. He said that â€Å"he will fully support the crafting of a firm policy that will address the serious problem on population. At the same time, Aquino said that â€Å"artificial contraception was a matter of choice and conscience and that health professionals who fool people into using artificial contraceptives should be penalized. As a Catholic, Aquino said he himself was not promoting artificial contraception but believes that the government should be able to provide it to Filipinos who ask for it. † Aquino stressed: â€Å"I’m a Catholic, I’m not promoting it. My position is more aptly called responsible parenthood rather than reproductive health. According to Rina Jimenez David who is pro-RH, during the â€Å"Women Deliver Philippines† Conference held September 2010, Dinky Soliman, Aquino’s Secretary of Social Welfare and Development, said that â€Å"choice and access† constituted the keystone of the Aquino government’s policy, reiterating the administration’s support for the pending reproductive health bills. On December 2010, the Cabinet and the CBCP agreed to have a joint campaign providing full information on the advantages and risks of contraceptives, natural and artificial family planning and responsible parenthood. They have established a technical working group for this purpose. They also agreed that government will not be an â€Å"instrument to enforce or violate the conscience of the people about these issues. † However, by April 2011 the President has given his full support to the entire RH Bill in a speech at the University of the Philippines and promised to push for its passage even at the â€Å"risk of excommunication. † Compromise and alternatives Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, Congressman Roilo Golez and Buhay party-list separately filed bills that seek to restrict abortion and birth control use. These bills have been seen either as a nullification of the RH Bill, its alternative, or as a way of achieving unity among the populace, since the RH Bill proponents have stated their concern in preventing abortion. Presidential candidate Gilbert Teodoro or Gibo suggested a cash transfer from the government to individuals wanting access to family planning methods, whether natural or artificial. The individuals can then make use of the cash they receive to purchase birth control devices they may choose, thus guaranteeing freedom of choice. The Loyola School of Theology and the John J. Carroll Institute on State and Church Issues issued 9 â€Å"Talking Points† on the RH Bill. Among other points, they proposed a study on the meaning of conception in the Constitution, and if it means fertilization, abortifacients â€Å"are to be banned even now and regardless of whether the RH Bill is passed†. They also proposed â€Å"parallel programs for providing information and training, one for Natural Family Planning (NFP) and another for artificial methods of family planning†. Columnist Jose Sison of the Philippine Star criticized this: â€Å"a Catholic School of theology has actually proposed in public, the use of tax payers’ money to train Filipinos to employ methods that are objectively and intrinsically evil† and cites â€Å"empirical evidence and scientific proofs confirming the harmful and evil effects of contraceptives to individuals and to society. † Recent events In September 2010, Aquino during this visit to the US reiterated his stand that he is in favor of responsible parenthood and respects the decision of each couple as to the number of children they want, and if they need the government support for contraception, then the government will provide it. This statement has created a furor as Catholic church leaders say that Aquino has sold out the Filipino soul in exchange for some â€Å"measly† aid from the United States. The President of the Catholic Bishops Conference said that there can possibly be an excommunication of the President if he continues on with his stance. Pro RH Bill Senators encouraged the President to be steadfast to do his duties towards the state. The President’s spokesperson Edwin Lacierda explained that the President â€Å"has not changed his stand† and is reaching out to the prelates and said that the President himself has not made any decision in support of the Reproductive Health Bill as he is still studying the document. Lacierda said that the Executive Branch â€Å"is not involved in the passage of the RH bill, saying the measure’s fate rests solely on the legislative branch. â€Å" Filipino Freethinkers, an association of agnostics, atheists, progressives, etc. , who have been very active in the fight in favor of the RH bill, stepped up the pressure, creating more controversy that fired up renewed interest in the bill on both sides. On 30 September 2010, one of the freethinkers, Carlos Celdran staged a protest action against the Catholic Church, holding a sign which read â€Å"DAMASO† – a reference to the villainous, corrupt clergyman Father Damaso of the novel Noli Me Tangere by Filipino revolutionary writer Jose Rizal – and shouting â€Å"stop getting involved in politics! A fan page, Free Carlos Celdran was created in Facebook, which generated 23,808 fans in 24 hours. Francisco Montalvan of the Inquirer said that in the end the Damasos are the scheming, corrupt and deceptive people, implying that the â€Å"pro-death advocates† are these, while the Cardinal Rosales who started a nationwide fund for the poor is very far from Damaso . Meanwhile, the Imam Council of the Philippines, the top leaders of the Moslem population which at 4. M constitutes 5% of the Philippine population, declared that they are against contraceptives since using them â€Å"underestimates God,† and â€Å"makes one lose morality in the process. † During the first public hearing on 24 Nov, the chair of the Committee on Population handling the bill said that there is no instruction from the Speaker of the House to expedite the bill. Upon the call of anti-RH congressmen, the Committee Chair decided to refer the bill also to the Committee on Health, since the bill is about Reproductive Health. Leader of the pro-RH group, Elizabeth Ansioco, said that the bill is doomed if it is referred to the Committee on Health. Anti-RH Deputy Speaker Congressman Pablo Garcia said the members of the Committee on Health know of the WHO announcement on the carcinogenicity of combined estrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives. House Speaker Belmonte said that Congress is not likely to rush the legislation of the bill and will tackle it in plenary early next year. Belmonte said it is better that highly contentious bills be given more attention. On 3 December, the Senate cut the proposed budget of P 880M for contraceptives down to P 8M for condoms since other contraceptives violated the Constitution’s ban on abortifacients, and Senator Tito Sotto III said that his constituents never asked for contraceptives. On 27 July 2012, the Speaker of the House decided to put to a vote by 7 August 2012 whether the debates have to be terminated. In response, pro-life groups and the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines have decided to call for a â€Å"Prayer Power Rally†, on 4 August 2012 at the historic Edsa Shrine. Meanwhile, 6 co-authors of the bill withdrew support, with the head of the minority group of the house declaring that 8 of their group are withdrawing their previous support for the bill. Congressional approval and presidential assent At 3 in the morning on December 13, 2012, the House of Representatives voted on second reading in favor of the bill with 113–109, while five representatives abstained. In the upper house, the Senate voted on December 18, 2012 to pass the bill on second reading with 13–8, while Senators Sergio Osmena, III and Lito Lapid were absent. On the same day, both houses passed the bill on the third and final reading. Members of the House of Representatives voted 133–79, while seven representatives abstained. The Senate registered 13–8, the same result as the second reading. On December 19, 2012, both versions of the bill were passed to the Bicameral Committee to produce a final version to be signed by the President Aquino. The committee quickly passed the bill in just one session. It was transmitted back to the House of Representatives and the Senate, which both ratified the bill, with the Senate voting 11–5 in favor of ratification, and the House of Representatives voting via voice vote. On December 21, 2012, President Aquino signed the bill into law, codifying the bill as Republic Act No. 10354, otherwise known as the â€Å"Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012†. News of the signing was announced by House Majority Leader Neptali Gonzales II on December 28, 2012. Reactions Averilla, Jim Waine C. Philippine Government Constitution I used to support the RH bill. But finding out the truth behind it, neither would you. I believe this law will put the Filipinos at risk of extinction because at its very core, the RH law is an extension of a secret, global conspiracy, a western attempt, to apply principles of eugenics on unsuspecting, inferior populations in order to prevent them from the human evolutionary process, at the end of which would, at the highest point, call forth the â€Å"master race†. The truth is in our hearts, we just have to listen to it. At first my interpretation of the RH bill led me to think that it was just a bill meant to help educate the uninformed about ways to prevent them from fornicating their way to a very bad financial situation. My ignorant mind devised some simple points as to why the RH Bill was right. I thought: 1. Minimum wage of a non-agricultural Filipino worker is P404. 2. If there were 20 working days in a month, the average minimum wage earning Filipino would earn around P8000 a month. 3. In average that person ate food on a regular basis, he will spend about around P70/day on food. There are 20 days in a month, so I guess that would equal to P2100 a month. 4. But if this person had a partner, he might want to feed her too. Feeding her would cost another P2100 a month. 5. P8000 – P4200 = P3800 6. If this person and his wife rented a home, or used electricity and bathed from time to time, the amount left from his salary would be significantly reduced. Lets say their utility bills and rend amounted to P1800 7. P3800 – P1800 = P2000 8. P2000 is a lot of money, but I don’t think they should have more than 3 children right? Babies need milk, diapers, toys, immunity injections, baby medicine, etc†¦ 9. From this let’s deduce that babies cost money. If babies cost money, I theorized that having more babies would cost more money. And from this data, I see that a person who spent a lot of money on children, but I didn’t earn a lot of money, would soon be broke and unable to provide for both himself and his children. Another word for broke situation is poverty. 10. I believe that a person can avoid being poor by making less babies. So, I thought that steps should be taken to inform people about this very little known fact. I also thought that the government should make contraceptives accessible so that people who don’t earn a lot can properly manage the little resources that they have. That’s why I supported the RH Bill. But now I know that I was wrong. I believe that the issue of the RH Bill is not a religious issue. â€Å"The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that the Philippines is overpopulated. † -I agree. I, myself, have observed that the Philippines is not overpopulated. In fact, if you use your common sense and think about it, you will realize a few things: 1. We are not overpopulated! Look at the mountains, the jungles, the caves and the ocean floor. There are no people there! 2. If we were really overpopulated, we would have trouble traveling. But if you go to EDSA, there’s no traffic. When you ride the MRT, it’s not packed with people. 3. Students in public schools are well educated because the teacher to student ratio is very low. In fact, because of our low population the government can basically guarantee that all public school students are provided books, notebooks and other school supplies. â€Å"The RH Bill is wrong because it assumes that contraceptives are good for mankind and women. 1. I agree, the RH Bill/Law is not good for women because it might draw a woman away from her one, true, universal purpose – the uninterrupted production of healthy babies 2. Furthermore, the role of women in society and the universe is to make babies. That’s why God made women. That’s their sole purpose in life. They’re not good fo r anything else. Ever wonder why there are no women in the clergy? Because they’re not good enough. 3. Contraceptives would allow women to enjoy the benefits of physical intimacy while maintaining a successful and productive career, if she so chooses. That is so wrong. Only men should be able to enjoy that privilege. 4. Women should get pregnant every single time they have sex and only immoral women enjoy sex without the possibility of conception. In fact, a better alternative would be for women, in general, to follow the example made by Mother Mary – to learn how to conceive without having sex. â€Å"The RH Bill/Law will put Filipinos at risk of extinction! † 1. Population decline is just bad for nations. Just look at the countries which have a declining population – Italy, Japan and Singapore. They’re in such a bad shape. The Philippines obviously has a better economy and has a higher literacy rate than these countries. In fact, many Italians, Japanese, and Singaporeans go to the Philippines for work. That only goes to show that a decline in population is bad for the economy. â€Å"Our population is our biggest asset! † 1. In my opinion, people should make as many babies as they can because the population is not a problem. In fact, the more babies a person has, the more assets he has. Forget real estate properties, stock investments, or Jollibee franchises. The real secret to increased wealth is babies. 2. If you have 15 babies, you’re practically wealthy because babies are assets 3. If you need money, you can sell them 4. If you can keep them alive until they can walk, they can one day beg for money in the streets – they’re going to have to anyway because there’s no way in hell you’ll be able to provide for all of them on your own 5. If ever a person is not able to feed the 15 babies he made, it’s the governments fault, because it’s the governments sole responsibility to make sure that every Filipino baby is fed. 6. The best way a person can contribute to this country is to contribute to its population. The RH Bill/Law is wrong because it assumes that reproductive education and contraceptives will effectively reduce cases of abortion. † 1. Reproductive/contraceptive education will have no effect on the number of abortion cases. In my opinion, these abortion cases will not lessen because women will continue to have abortions regard less of whether they are pregnant or not. 2. Abortions cannot be prevented. It’s just something that women naturally do. Like shopping, for example. â€Å"The RH Bill/Law is wrong because it will make people participate in extra-marital and pre-marital sex. † 1. The RH Bill/Law will practically encourage our people to engage in immoral activities. 2. We must protect our moral values and reject the RH Bill. Because, currently, not a single Filipino engages in pre-marital sex or extra-marital sex. Well at least this is what we believe until to this day. 3. The root cause of extra-marital and pre-marital sex is one’s exposure to contraceptives. There is just something in contraceptives that people find very arousing. 4. In western countries, men lure strange women into bed by shown those condoms. 5. If we ban condoms, absolutely no one would engage in premarital or extra-marital sex. The RH Bill/Law is wrong because it assumes that parents don’t teach their children about sex. † 1. The truth is that parents talk to their children about sex all the time. It’s so not awkward. The dad usually tells his children how he takes off all his clothes, does a sexy Tiger growl and makes sweet, sweet music with their motherâ€℠¢s body. 2. Also, a father usually advises his daughter that if she’s going to have sex with her boyfriend, she should use a condom. Sometimes the father even drives the daughter to the boyfriend’s house and waits for the couple to finish 3. Filipino daughters don’t have sex without the father’s permission. Unwanted pregnancies or teen pregnancies never happen to Filipino girls. That’s why we do not need the RH Law â€Å"The RH Bill is a conspiracy. † It’s all lies, all lies Salvador, Karissa Helene Philippine Government Constitution It is very much unfortunate, disappointing, and alarming that nobody in the mainstream media talks about the negative, unintended consequences of the fascist Reproductive Health bill, now called Responsible Parenthood bill, on the country’s business sector, particularly small businesses. I reject this legislative proposal primarily because it’s anti-reason, anti-individualism, and anti-capitalism. In other words it is against individual rights, liberty and economic freedom. This is just one of the many aspects of the bill– that it can negatively impact the country’s industry, particularly small business establishments that employ millions of professionals and skilled and even unskilled workers. Let’s take a small cafeteria, canteen, or publishing house near your place. Think about the small establishments and bar and restaurant stools in malls and many places in the metro. These small businesses that put two to ten or so people will be one of the main targets of the RH bill supported by some misguided, mediocre hippies who are mostly schooled and professionals. Yet nobody wants to talk about this issue. It’s as if these pro-RH bill hippies and fanatics think that wealth is created by wishful thinking, that is, by simply passing an intrusive, rights-violating bill purportedly designed to help the poor and women. What these anti-population and pro-regulation advocates don’t know is that the proposed legislative measure is itself a big insult to the poor and women. It is anti-poor and anti-women. The RH bill is a big insult to the poor because it treats them as dependent, parasites, worthless, or a leech who simply rely on other people’s extorted money or alms. Authors of the consolidated bill argue that one of the principal objectives of their highly moderate, anti-intellectual measure is to â€Å"help reduce poverty and achieve sustainable human development. † Still, what these political idiots do not and refuse to understand is that the government has no financial capability to deliver the promises of their measure because it is already bankrupt. The government, which is the worst parasite in this country, is not a productive agency or entity. It can only deliver some of the promised public services by using state force, like taxation, regulation, and forcible immolation of some social sectors like businessmen and health care providers. The consolidated RH law is a huge insult to women– and this is what statistician does not understand – because it considers them as inferior, ignorant, weak, having no mental, physical and emotional capability to decide on her own and to protect herself. It treats women as ignorant and weak because the law’s advocates believe that they need to pass a highly intrusive, unconstitutional legislative proposal to provide them the information and services they need. Also, the proposal is a big insult to every Filipino family because it treats parents as irresponsible, ignorant, weak, lazy, and having no capacity to make informed, responsible family decisions. It is stated that the law’s primary goal is to â€Å"help give parents the opportunity to exercise their right to freely and responsibly plan the number and spacing of their children. That’s the other way of saying that Filipino parents are not free and badly need the help and assistance of the state so to â€Å"responsibly plan the number and spacing of their children. † The bill’s highly mediocre and ignorant explanatory note adds: â€Å"The bill is truly rights-based. It mandates the provision of all forms of family planning, both modern natural and artificial, to women and couples as long as they are legal and medically-safe, and truly effective. However, the acceptance and adoption is the option and decision of parents and couple, particularly women. If that’s the case, why is there a need to pass the bill? The answer is because this is not what the bill is all about. In truth and in reality, it is about more political power! It’s about putting the entire business industry, medical profession and education sector under the total control and supervision of the state. In general, the bill is a BIG INSULT to the entire Filipino nation that has somehow embraced rational principles and the concept of freedom and individual rights. Those who ignorantly, naively take the consolidated bill at its face value will certainly accept the contradictory slogans. There are two sides of the consolidated bill: the fantasy side and the reality side. The measure’s fantasy side can be readily gleaned from its highly ignorant explanatory note, which is filled with supportive statistics and some tragic information about the plight of the poor and women. They did not state how except the fact that they enumerated the bill’s nice-to-hear intents and provisions. The reality side of the measure is that all those promised, stated RH services would be covered or delivered by sacrificing, enslaving employers and health care providers. Section 18 states: Employers’ Responsibilities- The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) shall ensure that employers respect the reproductive rights of workers. Consistent with the intent of Article 134 of the Labor Code, employers with more than two hundred (200) employees shall provide reproductive health services to all employees in their own respective health facilities. Those with less than two hundred (200) workers shall enter into partnerships with hospitals, health facilities, or health professionals in their areas for the delivery of reproductive health services. Employers shall furnish in writing the following information to all employees and applicants: (a) The medical and health benefits which workers are entitled to, including maternity and paternity leave benefits and the availability of family planning services; (b) The reproductive health hazards associated with work, including hazards that may affect their reproductive functions especially pregnant women; and (c) The availability of health facilities for workers. What does this section mean? Section 17 details the bill’s horrible fantastic scheme. So once the fascist bill is approved, any potential or aspiring employer would be covered by it, which means that he/she would be legally regarded as an indirect government employee. The employers or companies who have the capacity (with more than 200 employees) would be mandated by law to â€Å"provide reproductive health services to all employees in their own respective health facilities. This provision means that those employers and companies with more than 200 employees need to have their own â€Å"health facilities†, and this means additional expenses on the part of job-creators. On the other hand, employers with less than 200 employees shall enter into â€Å"partnerships with hospitals, health facilities, and/or health professionals in their areas for the delivery of reproductive health services. † Logic tells us that since employers and companies would be legally require d to shoulder additional expenses, then they are justified to increase the prices of their products and/or services. Does anyone think of PRICE CONTROL? The state control of the entire medical industry is laid out under Sections 20 (Implementing Mechanisms) and 22(1) on prohibited acts. The penalty that awaits erring, non-compliant employers and health care providers could be imprisonment ranging from one (1) month to six months or fine of P10,000 to P50,000 or both. This means that any employer may be sued by his/her employees for non-compliant with the intents and provisions of the bill. Once the RH bill is approved, anyone who thinks of starting a business, whether big or small, should consider the measure’s punitive provisions, some necessary expenses, and the need to deal with government regulators. In the United States, hundreds companies left the Democratic-infested California because of the state’s too much regulations and anti-business policies. This is why I have been telling my blog readers that the bill is NOT simply about serving the alleged interests of the poor and women; it is PRIMARILY about MORE GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS. The bill is about nanny statism or BIG GOVERNMENT. Already, many foreign investors do not want to invest in the Philippines because of its high tax rates, excessive economic regulations, pro-employee labor courts, leftist-activist court justices, among others. The Doingbusiness. orgrecently ranked Philippines 148th in terms of ease in doing business and 156th in terms of starting business. In terms of paying taxes, the country has been ranked 124th. Corporations pay a total tax rate (% profit) of 45. 8 percent! If approved, the RH bill would have the following negative impacts on small business: . It would be more difficult to start a new business considering the fact the the bill criminalizes the mere act of doing business and its regulative, interventionist provisions. 2. Employers would be forced to make additional expenses so to cover the RH care needs of their employees. 3. Since they are forced to make additional expenses, they might consider laying off some of their workers fo r survival. 4. Since they are forced to shell out additional expenses, they might not accept new applicants, a situation that would worsen the country’s unemployment rate. . Since they are forced to shell out additional expenses, they might consider some of the following survival measure: 1) salary cut, 2) less bonus or benefits, 3) cost cutting, 4) no expansion, 5) close business. 6. Since they are forced to shell out additional expenses, they might consider PRICE INCREASE. 7. There would be more informal sectors (unlisted, unregistered businesses) so to avoid paying more taxes and complying with government regulations. 8. Potential and existing employers would be considered a NEW CLASS OF CRIMINALS or ENEMY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE. . Those who have the money and resources would rather invest in a business-friendly economic environment like Hong Kong, India and other Asian countries. 10. Employers would simply shrug. You can help the poor without enslaving and treating businessmen , doctors and some other people as potential criminals or enemies of social progress. Think like a human being, not like a parasite! You don’t help the poor and the marginalized by supporting the RH bill; it’s both the big and small businesses that can truly help them! How to cite Rh Bill, Papers

Healthy Baby for Healthy Brain- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Write about theHealthy Baby for Healthy Brain. Answer: A number of aspects every parent needs to keep in mind in order to help the baby develop a healthy brain. The first initiative begins when the mother is in the prenatal period during her pregnancy. The kind of food that is taken up by the mother during this period has a huge impact on brain development of the child. Researchers are of the opinion that food high in nutrients should be always taken by such mothers. Moreover, they should twice the amount of nutrients required but that does not necessarily mean taking twice the amount of food that is required. Some of the important nutrients that are important for the development of the brain of the child is folate, vitamin C, iron, omega three fats and even iron. Therefore, diet and lifestyle are said by nutritionist to be very important as they help in the development of the brain of the baby. Attachment is one of the most important attribute that also helps to have positive impacts on the brain development of the baby and their perceptions of attachments. Caregivers should always stay nearby or in close proximity with their babies. Researchers say that when babies do not find their caregivers nearby, they feel stress and nervous that affects their brain. The parents should not only stay nearby but in order to develop sense of attachment, the caregivers should try to understand what makes the babies secure and how they can make their babies secure. This makes the baby develop the feelings that present care about them and therefore develop positive perceptions of their immediate world. This starts even before the born of the child. Researchers suggest mothers to talk, sing with the baby and touch their womb often with an affectionate feeling. The baby should be hold only in a straight manner and not in sleeping position. They should be cuddled and interacted with smile and playfulness. This is done to make them feel that parents are there to respond for them in their upsetting hours. Nutrition is one of the most important attribute for development of brain. Mothers are advised to provide breast milk to their children for their babies for the first two years. This is said so because breast milk comprises of many important antibodies and nutrients that help the brain to not only develop properly but also keep babies safe from infections. The parents are also advised not to provide the babies with extremely costly food like expensive vitamins and similar others. Parents should familiarize babies with the use of healthy food making babies develop the habit of liking healthy food only and motivating them by being an example herself. Moreover, researchers are also of the opinion that toddlers should be involved in simple cooking activities and meal preparation so that they can develop good relationships with healthy foods. Processed food lack nutrients and should be avoided. Children should be made to participate in fun activities while preparing foods so that they can understand the foods that are encouraged to it. Dieticians are of the opinion the babies who eat healthy freshly prepared meal have better brain development as parents have control over the ingredients of the food like low salt, low fat, low sugar. Parents should provide importance to babies cues when they are full. They should do so by turning their heads towards other side. Stress has negative aspect on the brain development of the child. Stress has the potential to create heart issues and immune system issues in the babies and the children. There is an important hormone called cortisol that is called the stress hormone that affects the ways by which brain is wired up. Babies who have stress in the childhood can result in development of adults who have heart problems. Anger, violence, deprivation and feeling of left alone have negative effects on babies by creating stress. Violence in home or neighborhood, aggression among parents, divorces or illnesses among the parents create stress in babies that affects babies development. There are many of caregivers who may be under stress may fail to provide love, care, affection and response in its best form. This might affect effective development of the baby and the brain. Some of the ways by which stress can be avoided is by taking the baby away from different stressful situations and finding peaceful ways of solving disagreements among parents or other family members. The parents should step back and take control of emotions in front of the baby. All these will prevent any negative effects on the brain of the baby.